Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Background

The BenchBot Image Acquisition System and likely PlantMap3D applications, have the need for a relatively low cost (for PM3D at least) and waterproof (for both) camera flash system.

We have not been able to find a suitable COTS device. Existing industrial flashes are both too expensive $1500+ per unit, and not bright enough (RHI200-DO lighting for logistics - Smart Vision Lights).

The existing consumer grade flash we use (Godox Witstro Ring Flash AR400 AR400 B&H Photo Video (bhphotovideo.com) Is typically bright enough for Ag Image Repo applications, although in certain circumstances, such as very harsh daylight shadows, there could be a benefit to having a more intense flash. Although it is more than bright enough for PM3D applications, which have less intense image quality requirements. However, this type of flash is not suitable for long term usage in our application. First, there is no ingress protection. Second, it is hard to integrate both mechanically and electrically into a robotic system. And third, while a reasonable cost ($450) for BB/IAS application, it would not be affordable for PM3D MultiOak / cam where 4-8 units would be needed for each system.

To Summarize:

Existing Consumer Flash Units
  • Awkward to mechanically integrate

  • Awkward to electrically integrate

  • No meaningful ingress protection

  • low durability / reliability

  • Still too costly for the multi camera systems

Existing Industrial Flash Units
  • Expensive ($1500+) per unit

  • Not bright enough for BB / IAS applications

  • Very few options / suppliers available

    • Limits install flexibility

For these reasons we are exploring the design of an in-house flash unit to fulfill our needs.

Direction

The flash system will likely be LED for the following reasons:

  • LEDs are more physically durable than Xenon flash tubes.

  • A well implemented LED flash should lasty much longer than Xenon tubes.

  • LED flash systems require much lower voltages (50-100V vs. 300-500V) which helps size, cost, complexity, and safety.

  • Building a flash from multiple LED modules provides more flexibility than Xenon tubes which come in a limited number of sizes and shapes.

  • An LED flash can be controlled in a much more precise way than Xenon tubes, where if implemented both brightness and duration can be precisely controlled.

Initial research has found that there is a significant lack of information / standard designs with LED camera flashes. So, the design phase will be proceeded by a more significant research / prototyping stage than our typical hardware projects.

  • No labels

0 Comments

You are not logged in. Any changes you make will be marked as anonymous. You may want to Log In if you already have an account.