Rough Ideas for what to test from prior conversations:
is the language Ok for the audience?
What do we think about polygon map?
Major question:
Will we be able to observe testers with the tool? or should we focus on demo, then discussion?
Usability
How easy does it seem to navigate through the different sections of the app?
How easy does it seem to find the information you need quickly?
How intuitive does it seem to move through the different steps?
How easy is it to make sense of the tool? Are there words or sections that feel too technical? Did you see jargon that folks might not recognize?
Feature Usability
...
Observe user interactions with the app and collect feedback. Ask questions page by page, then ask the wrap-up questions.
Find Missions Page:
What’s your first impression of this screen? What do you like , or dislike?
What do you think about using polygon to draw on the map?
Pick Your Missions Page:
What’s your first impression of this screen? What do you like , or dislike?
What do you think about the approach to finding a mission?
Is there other information you would expect to see on this pageDo you feel you’re getting the information needed on the missions?
Create your Grid Page:
What’s your first impression of this screen? What do you like , or dislike?
What do you think about the approach to setting up a grid?
Is there other information you would expect to see on this page?
Do you have what you need to create the grid that you’d like to use? Are there field features that you’d like that aren’t in the tool? Are the field features present relevant to you?
How do you like rotating the map before drawing the plot boundary? Is there another approach you'd like to see in order to create the plot grid?
What edits / modifications would you want to make to the grid?
Your Plot Page:
Relevance:
How relevant is the information provided to your personal work? What’s missing or irrelevant?
In what ways can you see yourself using this information?
Benefit:
What’s your impression of this screen? What do you like , or dislike?
How might you see this section being relevant to your work? How would you want to use the exports?
Is there other information you would expect to see on this page?
How many of them prefer either tool output?
Should the tool give a vegetation index/number or an image of all the plots?
Understanding Value
What would be the most valuable addition/s here?
Wrap-up Questions:
Chris’s sense of Dec 9 agenda: Walk through version 1 to get feedback for version 2, and then break into groups by level of experience.
What we want to learn from this testing group. Chris: watch them interact with it and see how it goes. Major question: should the tool give a vegetation index/number or an image of all the plots? Ask each group: how many of them prefer either tool output?
Amanda: we should gather everything we need from the groups at our Dec 9 meeting. They won’t have time to do anything afterward.
Rob: there are strong personalities. Good idea to break up the 20 people into smaller groups. Chris is working on reducing the number. It has gotten politically complex.
- Next step: Chris will send an email re hold the date. He, Rob, and Amanda are discussing whom to invite.
Would this tool be helpful to you and why? How, if at all, do you think this tool will would improve your work? What specific problems or challenges could this tool help you solve?
Future Use:
Would you use this tool again in the future?
What features would you like to see added to the app?
Group Organization
Expected Attendees:
20 Breeders
3-4 super users
3-4 admins
Option 1:
2 breeder groups (M & Shannon each take one)
1 high level group (Chris/ Steven take one)
Option 2:
1 breeder group (Shannon)
1 high level group (Marguerite)
How intuitive does it seem to move through the different steps?
Could you see yourself using this? Why or why not?
How easy is it to make sense of the tool? Are there words or sections that feel too technical? Did you see jargon that folks might not recognize?
Have you used other products like this? What do they have that you like? What are they lacking that you’d like to see?
What should we call this?
Respondent Survey: