Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Rough Ideas for what to test from prior conversations:

  • is the language Ok for the audience?

  • What do we think about polygon map?

  • Major question:

(question) Will we be able to observe testers with the tool? or should we focus on demo, then discussion?

Usability

  • How easy does it seem to navigate through the different sections of the app?

  • How easy does it seem to find the information you need quickly?

  • How intuitive does it seem to move through the different steps?

  • How easy is it to make sense of the tool? Are there words or sections that feel too technical? Did you see jargon that folks might not recognize?

Feature Usability

  • Find Missions:

    • What’s your first impression of this screen? What do you like, or dislike?

    • What do you think about using polygon to draw on the map?

  • Pick Your Missions:

    • What’s your first impression of this screen? What do you like, or dislike?

    • What do you think about the approach to finding a mission?

    • Is there other information you would expect to see on this page?

  • Create your Grid:

    • What’s your first impression of this screen? What do you like, or dislike?

    • What do you think about the approach to setting up a grid?

    • Is there other information you would expect to see on this page?

  • Your Plot:

    • What’s your impression of this screen? What do you like, or dislike?

    • How might you see this section being relevant to your work? How would you want to use the exports?

    • Is there other information you would expect to see on this page?

    • How many of them prefer either tool output?

    • Should the tool give a vegetation index/number or an image of all the plots?

Understanding Value

  • Relevance:

    • How relevant is the information provided to your personal work? What’s missing or irrelevant?

    • In what ways can you see yourself using this information?

  • Benefit:

    • How, if at all, do you think this tool will improve your work?

    • What specific problems or challenges could this tool help you solve?

  • Future Use:

    • Would you use this tool again in the future?

    • What features would you like to see added to the app?

Group Organization

Expected Attendees:

  • 20 Breeders

  • 3-4 super users

  • 3-4 admins

Option 1:

2 breeder groups (M & Shannon each take one)
1 high level group (Chris/ Steven take one)

Option 2:

1 breeder group (Shannon)
1 high level group (Marguerite)

  • Chris’s sense of Dec 9 agenda: Walk through version 1 to get feedback for version 2, and then break into groups by level of experience.

  • What we want to learn from this testing group. Chris: watch them interact with it and see how it goes. Major question: should the tool give a vegetation index/number or an image of all the plots? Ask each group: how many of them prefer either tool output?

  • Amanda: we should gather everything we need from the groups at our Dec 9 meeting. They won’t have time to do anything afterward.

  • Rob: there are strong personalities. Good idea to break up the 20 people into smaller groups. Chris is working on reducing the number. It has gotten politically complex.

  • Next step: Chris will send an email re hold the date. He, Rob, and Amanda are discussing whom to invite.

  • No labels